The Otium Post

The Otium Post


Illuminati Is REAL: Rigged Elections 2016 New World Order GLOBAL Collapse Imminent

Illuminati Is REAL: Rigged Elections 2016 New World Order GLOBAL Collapse Imminent



NYC - Election-Trump :>




Proving Illuminati´s  control over all previous US elections,and control of the economy through

their Federal Reserve Bank which is privately owned by them.

Extensive but interesting video.




Will the New World Order use a brokered convention to steal the nomination from Trump?

Will the New World Order controlling the Republican Party use a brokered convention to steal the Presidential nomination from Donald Trump?

The Individual (a.k.a: Reptilian Dimension) / January 17, 2016

Trump is a thorn in the side of the New World Order. The New World Order seeks to establish a one world government by collapsing the borders of civilized Western countries, and using radical Islam to destabilize traditionally Christian Protestant nations. The massive immigration of radical Islamist’s into Europe and other places is changing the faces of nations and destabilizing them. Just like in the Middle East where Islam dominates; Jews and Christians are being persecuted in their native countries. One Jewish man who was interviewed in England spoke how he had to fortify his home and could not have guests at his house because it was too dangerous. The man had suffered so many attacks and threats in England he was considering moving to Israel. 

In the town of Luton in England, Islam has established itself and the town has now become a hot spot for radical Islam, and spawned various terrorists which included the 7/7 bombers who attacked London. Europe’s left wing New World Order policies which include massive Islamic immigration is turning Europe upside down. Some of the terrorists who attacked Paris and killed over a hundred people were refugees from Syria, and even the radical Islamic group ISIS has stated they would use the immigration program to send it’s members to Western countries. 

The policies of the political establishment all over the world seem to include embracing radical Muslim’s. Does the New World Order want to use Islam to establish a one world religion? Well known Bible preacher John MacCarthur believes the Antichrist will be an Islamic Messiah. Former leader of the English Defence League, Tommy Robinson, stated that the Islamic immigration was population replacement. Tommy Robinson formed the English Defense League after seeing his town turn into a habitation for radical Islamic terrorists. Robinson would regularly see posters in his town which glorified the terrorists who flew planes into the world trade center in New York, and he also observed on the local Mosques website; an article which discussed how killing infidels was justified. Other problems Robinson observed was Muslim’s attacking people of other religions, and this hate was being taught in local Mosques and encouraged. 

Massive immigration of Muslim’s into European and Western countries, is turning whole towns into radical Islamic hot spots and these towns are becoming too dangerous for non-Muslims. In Paris there are a number of no-go zone areas for non-Muslims as these highly populated Muslim areas are unsafe for non-Muslims to enter. These are the sort of situations Islamic immigration is causing in these countries. The New World Order seems to greatly desire this Islamic immigration and they persecute anyone for questioning it. Former English Defense League leader Tommy Robinson was put in jail for protesting against radical Islam. 

The only political leader in the world that seems to be taking a stand against radical Islam is Donald Trump; much to the dismay of the New World Order controlled political establishment. Who knows why the New World Order wants to flood Western countries with radical Muslims, but it definitely seems to be related to collapsing the borders of sovereign nations and establishing a one world government and religion. Illustrations painted on the Masonic Denver airport show pictures of a girl holding a Bible with a Jewish star on her chest while she lays in a coffin. The pictures also show a man holding an Islamic sword while attacking a white dove. These pictures could be a picture of how the New World Order will use Islam to destroy Christianity and Judaism in the United States. The Democratic left wing policies include having weak collapsed borders and allowing millions of Muslims to enter the United States, and the Republican Party seems to have the same policy as well even though they pretend to be conservative and different from the Democrats. Well known political commentator Michael Savage stated that the Democrats and Republicans are controlled by the same people and there’s really no difference. I tend to agree with Michael Savage. 

I believe the Republicans and Democrats are both controlled by the same special interest groups and donors who are aligned with the New World Order. The New World Order seeks a one world government under the United Nations and the political establishment is working toward this goal. Donald Trump however has risen up and is taking a stand against the New World Order which uses it’s political correctness police to strike down anyone who opposes them. In other countries such as: Israel (politician Rabbi Kahane was put in jail by the Israeli Supreme Court for complaining about Islam and Arab’s) and Europe (Tommy Robinson and other protesters of Islam have also had legal action brought against them) protesters against radical Islam are persecuted by the authorities. The United Kingdom is now considering banning Donald Trump because of his views. 

The UK in many respects resembles Saudi Arabia in certain towns, and Islamic expert Robert Spencer believes England will become an Islamic State in the future. In nations where Islam rules you have a fascist dictatorship rule where anyone who disagrees with the government or religious leaders is put to death or put in jail. Islam seems to be a religion that could be used by the New World Order to control the population through a one world religion. All over the world the political establishment is bowing down to radical Islam, and invading their nations with radical Muslim’s whose values and beliefs are completely opposed to Western culture.

Donald Trump seems to be a genuine Presidential candidate who has heard truth from the alternative media, and understands that the United States is being destroyed by design. The United States is one of the big challenges for the New Wolrd Order and UN because their: constitution, bill of rights and historical Christian culture prevent the New World Order from establishing a one world government, and that is why the NWO is using Obama to flood the US with radical Muslim’s. The NWO want to use Islam to destroy the US.

One of the leading voices in the alternative media, Alex Jones, has stated that Trump almost has an invisible force field surrounding him, as none of the attacks against him from the NWO controlled media seem to stick. When Trump first came into the Presidential race the entire NWO controlled media came against him and tried their best to drag him down. However because Trump has such an outstanding record of being a successful businessman and he has a great reputation; nothing they threw at him would stick. Even former heavyweight boxing champ Mike Tyson said it was clear the mainstream media was trying to convince voters not to vote for Trump. Trump is not owned by anybody and is not controlled by the New World Order, Trump is financing his own campaign and is running because he wants to make the US a better place.

The New World Order led by the: Jesuit Order, Scottish Rite Freemasonry, Shriners (Masonic/Islamic group) and Vatican Knighthoods have had their way in the United States for many years. Over the years they have been chipping away at the constitution and using the US for their own purposes. It seems the NWO have been allowing Muslim terrorists into the US, and even aiding them to attack the US so they can use the attacks to establish laws contrary to the US constitution. We saw this occur when the September 11th attacks were used as a pretext to establish the Patriot Act which was another attack against the US constitution. 

Many of the Muslim hijackers were known FBI/CIA assets and even Osama Bin Laden was a known CIA asset. At least two of the September 11 plane hijackers were in the US on expired VISA’s, which indicates that the relaxed borders and immigration policies of the US create an environment for Muslim terrorists to thrive. The only politician at present who seems to be taking a stand against these problems is Donald Trump. Donald Trump wants to build a wall between the US and Mexico and ban Muslim’s from entering the United States until they can be vetted properly. 

Trump also wants to impose tariffs on China and other countries which would bring jobs and manufacturing back to the United States. Many of the founding fathers of the United States imposed taxes on imported good to protect local manufacturers. It’s clear Donald Trump’s policies would make America great again and bring it to a place of safety and prosperity. The New World Order however is completely opposed to Trump’s policies as they want to destroy America by design.

Much to the dismay of the New World Order Trump’s poll numbers are going through the roof and many polls also suggest he could beat Hillary Clinton. Trump is clearly anti-NWO and is an obstacle to their plans and they want to stop him. Alternative media voice Alex Jones has even suggested they may even try to assassinate him. They could very well assassinate him a number of ways. The historical assassinate device of the Jesuit’s has usually been poison as they regularly poisoned Popes who wouldn’t obey them. Stanley Meyer who invented a car powered by water (a threat to the Islamic nations and oil companies) was also poisoned. However another way the NWO could destroy Trump’s chances of being nominated is through a brokered convention within the Republican Party. A brokered convention involves a lot of complex and shadowy politician moves, that result in no Republican Presidential candidate being nominated by Republican delegates.

Wikipedia defines a brokered convention as stated below.

“In United States politics, a brokered convention is a situation in which no single candidate has secured a pre-existing majority of delegates (whether those selected by primary elections and caucuses, or super-delegates) prior to the first official vote for a political party’s presidential candidate at its nominating convention. Once the first ballot, or vote, has occurred, and no candidate has a majority of the delegates’ votes, the convention is then considered brokered; thereafter, the nomination is decided through a process of alternating political horse-trading, and additional re-votes.” (Wikipedia)

At present Republican voters clearly want Trump to be the candidate as he has double digit leads over all other Republican Presidential candidates. Former political adviser Roger Stone has stated that Donald Trump represents a population uprising, as Trump is an uncontrolled candidate, who wants to make America great again, instead of destroying it and bringing it under the United Nations. 

Donald Trump has also appeared in the alternative media and supported media personalities exposing the New World Order. Trump has appeared on both the Savage Nation and Infowars, and both programs are dedicated to exposing the New World Order and coming one world government. Trump is definitely anti-establishment and anti-NWO. The only thing that can stop Trump from being the nominee is through a brokered convention and I think it’s possible the NWO will use their controlled politicians to do this. However because a brokered convention could cause a backlash from American citizens, it’s also possible the NWO may resort to voter fraud as seen in the congressman Allen West case.

President Obama was trained by a Jesuit Priest named Greg Galuzzo at the Gamaliel foundation in communist tactics, and he was also taught how to destroy the US constitution there as well. Obama’s tactics in destroying the United States are consistent with the communist/left wing/Islamic alliance using Islamic immigration to destroy traditionally Christian nations. Since the Jesuit’s (Greg Galuzzo) have been caught training future Islamic/communist leaders like President Obama it’s clear the Jesuit’s are behind this communist/Islamic movement sweeping Europe and Christian nations. The current Jesuit Pope has stated that all religions find God in different ways and the Pope seems to be an Islamic apologist. It’s quiet possible the Pope could convert to Islam and create a one world religion using Islam and Islamic leaders, and this one world government and religion could be ruled through the United Nations. 

The current policies of the United Nations are anti-Christian and they seem to be aiding and apologizing to radical Islam on a regular basis. The UN’s policies in the Middle East and Eastern Europe (Serbia) have resulted in the death of millions of Christians so it’s quiet possible the UN could use a type of Islam as it’s one world religion. The Jesuit’s were never Christians and only control the Vatican because they assassinated their way into power. The Jesuit Order are secretly a cult of black magicians and are the leaders of Luciferian Scottish Rite Freemasonry and an Islamic Masonic group known as the Shriners.

The Jesuit’s also have strong links to the Bush family as Jeb Bush is a Vatican Knight (controlled by the Jesuit Order). Jeb Bush is listed as a member of the Knights of Columbus which is a Vatican Knighthood and secret society under the authority of the Jesuit Order. George W Bush was also a member of a secret society called the Skull and Bones, and in this initiation Bush was required to kiss the slipper of the Pope which symbolizes submission to the Jesuit Order who control the Pope. 

The Jesuit Order are a group of professional assassins and spies hiding under religious costumes, and were once banned from dozens of nations all around the world for political infiltration and assassination. The Jesuit’s also control Scottish Rite Freemasonry as they wrote the Scottish Rite Degrees at the College of Clermont in France. The Jesuit’s also use Scottish Rite Freemasonry to control the political establishment in the US as well. The Knights of Malta (Vatican Knighthood controlled by the Jesuit Order) also have observer status on the UN council. The Jesuit’s using these various secret societies could instigate a brokered convention and stop Trump from getting the nomination.

I have written an article in the past about how the Jesuit’s control the CIA through the Knights of Malta, and many prominent journalists have reported that ISIS and other militant Islamic groups are: supported, equipped and funded by the CIA. It also seems the Jesuit’s control political candidates through these same secret societies as Jeb Bush who is running against Trump is a Knight of Columbus. Trump is essentially competing against the Jesuit Order and the Jesuit Order do not like to lose and rarely lose. The Jesuit’s will not want Trump to win so they will either assassinate him or use a brokered convention to get rid of him. I think a brokered convention is very possible.



Illuminati are obviously intimidated by Trump's success and will go to any underhanded tricks to eliminate him. It seems pretty treacherous by the Republicans to attack their own to please Illuminati's wishes. Rather a rotten game if you ask me ...

But,this is the footprint of Illuminati,conquer and split. Thesis and anti-thesis = Synthesis.

Sunday we got more proof that everything that was previously unimaginable in a US presidential election is possible in 2016. Republican Charles Koch, one of the two wealthy Koch brothers, revealed that he is now considering supporting democrat Hillary Clinton.  Both support the NWO.


Nå er det offisielt. Her er Iluminatis plan for å slå Trump med renkespill

Nå er det offisielt. Her er deres plan for å slå Trump

Bekreftes av begge kandidatene

Mandag 25. april 2016, kl.06:29

KOORDINERER: Tidlig mandag morgen norsk tid kom det meldinger fra kampanjene til Ted Cruz og John Kasich om at de har blitt enige om å dele opp de tre neste delstatene seg imellom. Det skriver New York Times. Foto: REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/NTB Scanpix

(Dagbladet): Sterke krefter i det republikanske partiet har lenge desperat forsøkt å stoppe Donald Trump i jakten på nominasjonen til høstens presidentvalg, men så langt har det vært vanskelig å få de andre kandidatene til å trekke i samme retning.

Inntil nå.

Tidlig mandag morgen norsk tid kom det meldinger fra kampanjene til Ted Cruz og John Kasich om at de har blitt enige om å dele opp de tre neste delstatene seg imellom. Det skriver New York Times.

Jeff Roe leder kampanjen til senator Cruz fra Texas. Han sier at det nå er på tide at de «fokuserer tiden og ressursene i Indiana for å gjøre det enklere for Kasich å konkurrere i Oregon og New Mexico».

Likeledes kom en tilsvarende melding fra Kasichs sjefstrateg John Weaver. Han kunne fortelle at de nå «vil konsentrere seg om statene i vest, og gi Cruz fritt spillerom i Indiana».

Begge kampanjene forventer nå at deres allierte og støttespillere følger instruksjonene.

Rivaler i samme retning

Cruz og Kasich har lenge rivalisert. For det første har Cruz omtalt sistnevnte som et uromoment i valgkampen, og at Kasich ødelegger hans sjanser til å ta igjen Trump i antall delegater. Cruz har også stilt spørsmål om Kasich ser for seg å bli Trumps visepresidentkandidat.

Dette er ikke første gang forslaget blir bragt på bane. Allerede i mars skal Weaver ha forhørt seg med Roe om det var noen muligheter for å dele opp de resterende statene seg imellom. Det ble den gang blankt avvist av Cruz-leiren.

Trump selv responderte på nyheten på sedvanlig vis da han tok til Twitter:

- Wow. Løgnaktige Ted og Kasich skal samarbeide for å holde meg unna den republikanske nominasjonen. DESPERASJON, skriver han, før han fortsetter:

- Løgnaktige Ted og Kasich er matematisk sett døde og fullstendig desperate. Donorene og interessegruppene er ikke fornøyde med dem. Trist!

1237 delegater

Trump vant i forrige uke nominasjonsvalget i New York. For å unngå en «brokered convention», altså et åpent landsmøte, må en av de republikanske kandidatene i teorien vinne over 1237 delegater i nominasjonsvalgene.

Trump har nå 845, Ted Cruz har 559 og John Kasich 148.

Trump er nå den eneste kandidaten som kan nå 1237 delegater, og Cruz og Kasich drar nå i samme retning for å stoppe det.


Now it's official. Here is their plan to stop Trump

Coordinate: Early Monday morning Norwegian time there were reports from the campaigns to Ted Cruz and John Kasich that they have agreed to divide up the next three states among themselves. It writes New York Times. Photo: REUTERS / Carlo Allegri / NTB Scanpix

(Dagbladet): Powerful forces within the Republican Party has long desperately tried to stop Donald Trump in pursuit of the nomination for this autumn's presidential election, but so far it has been difficult to get the other candidates to pull in the same direction.

Until now.

Early Monday morning Norwegian time there were reports from the campaigns to Ted Cruz and John Kasich that they have agreed to divide up the next three states among themselves.It writes New York Times.

Jeff Roe leader campaign to Senator Cruz of Texas. He says that now is the time that they "focus time and resources in Indiana to make it easier for Kasich to compete in Oregon and New Mexico."

Likewise got a similar message from Kasichs chief strategist John Weaver. He could tell that they now "will concentrate on the states in the west and give Cruz leeway in Indiana."

Both campaigns now expects its allies and supporters follow the instructions.

Rivals in the same direction
Cruz and Kasich has long rivals. Firstly Cruz described the latter as a disturbing element in the campaign, and that Kasich ruining his chances to catch up with Trump in the number of delegates. Cruz has also questioned whether Kasich envisions becoming Trumps running mate.

This is not the first time the proposal comes up. Already in March, Weaver have inquired with Roe if there were any possibilities for dividing up the remaining states among themselves. It was then rejected by Cruz camp.

Trump even responded to the news in conventional manner when he took to Twitter:

- Wow. Lying Favourable Ted and Kasich will work together to keep me away from the Republican nomination. Desperation, he writes, before continuing:

- Lying Favourable Ted and Kasich is mathematically dead and completely desperate. The donors and stakeholders are not satisfied with them. Sad!

1237 delegates
Trump won last week nomination election in New York. To avoid a "brokered convention", ie an open congress, one of the Republican candidates in theory win over 1237 delegates in nominating elections.

Trump now has 845, Ted Cruz has 559 and John Kasich 148.

Trump is now the only candidate that can reach 1237 delegates, and Cruz and Kasich go now in the same direction to stop it.

-------------------------------------------------- ---


Illuminati are obviously intimidated by Trump's success and will go to any underhanded tricks to eliminate him. It seems pretty treacherous by the Republicans to attack their own to please Illuminatis wishes. Rather a rotten game if you ask me ...

But,this is the footprint of Illuminati,conquer and split. Thesis and anti-thesis = Synthesis.

Sunday we got enough proof that everything that was previously unimaginable in a US presidential election is possible in 2016. Republican Charles Koch, one of the two wealthy Koch brothers, revealed that he is now considering supporting Hillary Clinton.  Both support NWO.



Illuminati er tydeligvis skremt av Trump´s suksess og vil gaa til ethvert underhaandig triks for aa eliminere ham.  Synes det temmelig foraederisk av republikanerne aa anngripe sine egne for aa tekkes Illuminatis oensker.  Temmelig raattent spill om du spoer meg...

Men,dette er typisk for Illuminati,hersk og splitt. These og anti-these =Synthese.  Lage full forvirring i blandt republikanerne.

Søndag fikk vi nok et bevis på at alt som tidligere var utenkelig i et amerikansk presidentvalg
er mulig i 2016. Republikaneren Charles Koch, den ene av de to styrtrike Koch-brødrene, røpet at han nå vurderer å støtte Hillary Clinton.  Begge stoetter NWO.



The great political betrayal of Brazil

The great betrayal

Dilma Rousseff has let her country down. But so has the entire political class

Apr 23rd 2016 | From the print edition Timekeeper 

BRAZIL’S Congress has witnessed some bizarre scenes in its time. In 1963 a senator aimed a gun at his arch-enemy and killed another senator by mistake. In 1998 a crucial government bill failed when a congressman pushed the wrong button on his electronic voting device. But the spectacle in the lower house on April 17th surely counts among the oddest. One by one, 511 deputies filed towards a crowded microphone and, in ten-second bursts broadcast to a rapt nation, voted on the impeachment of the president, Dilma Rousseff. Some were draped in Brazilian flags. One launched a confetti rocket. Many gushed dedications to their home towns, religions, pet causes—and even Brazil’s insurance brokers. The motion to forward charges against Ms Rousseff to the Senate for trial passed by 367 votes to 137, with seven abstentions.

The vote comes at a desperate time. Brazil is struggling with its worst recession since the 1930s. GDP is expected to shrink by 9% from the second quarter of 2014, when the recession started, to the end of this year. Inflation and the unemployment rate are both around 10%.

The failure is not only of Ms Rousseff’s making. The entire political class has let the country down through a mix of negligence and corruption. Brazil’s leaders will not win back the respect of its citizens or overcome the economy’s problems unless there is a thorough clean-up.

Ditching Dilma
Sunday’s vote was not the end of Ms Rousseff, but her departure cannot now be far off. Brazil ought not to mourn her. Incompetence in her first term in office, from 2011 to 2014, has made the country’s economic plight incomparably worse. Her Workers’ Party (PT) is a prime mover behind a gargantuan bribery scheme centred on Petrobras, the state-controlled oil company, which channelled money from contractors to politicians and parties. Although Ms Rousseff has not been personally implicated in the wrongdoing, she tried to shield her predecessor as president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, from prosecution.

What is alarming is that those who are working for her removal are in many ways worse. If the Senate votes to put her on trial, probably by mid-May, Ms Rousseff will have to step aside for up to 180 days. The vice-president, Michel Temer, who comes from a different party, will take over and serve out her term if the Senate removes her from office (see article). Mr Temer may provide short-term economic relief. Unlike the hapless Ms Rousseff, he knows how to get things done in Brasília and his Party of the Brazilian Democratic Movement (PMDB) is friendlier to business than the PT.

But the PMDB is hopelessly compromised, too. One of its leaders is the speaker of the lower house, Eduardo Cunha, who presided over Sunday’s six-hour impeachment spectacle and has himself been charged by the supreme court with taking bribes through the Petrobras scheme. In announcing their “no” votes, some of Ms Rousseff’s allies denounced Mr Cunha as a “gangster” and a “thief”.

The taint of corruption is spread across many Brazilian parties. Of the 21 deputies under investigation in the Petrobras affair, 16 voted for Ms Rousseff’s impeachment. About 60% of congressmen face accusations of criminal wrongdoing.

There are no quick ways of putting this right. The roots of Brazil’s political dysfunction go back to the slave-based economy of the 19th century, to dictatorship in the 20th and to a flawed electoral system that both makes campaigns ruinously expensive and also shields politicians from account.

In the short run, impeachment will not fix this. The charge that is the basis for trying Ms Rousseff—that she manipulated accounts last year to make the fiscal deficit look smaller than it was—is so minor that just a handful of congressmen bothered to mention it in their ten-second tirades. If Ms Rousseff is ousted on a technicality, Mr Temer will struggle to be seen as a legitimate president by the large minority of Brazilians who still back Ms Rousseff.

Waxing and waning: Brazil's economic woes, in charts
In any other country, such a cocktail of economic decline and political conflict might be combustible. Yet Brazil has remarkable reserves of tolerance. Divided as they are over the rights and wrongs of impeachment, Brazilians have kept their anger in check. The past three decades suggest that theirs is a country which can endure a crisis without resorting to coups or collapses. And here, perhaps, is a shred of hope.

The fact that the Petrobras scandal has ensnared some of the country’s most powerful politicians and businessmen is a sign that some institutions, especially those that enforce the law, are maturing. One reason politicians are in such trouble is that a new, better-educated and more assertive middle class refused to put up with their impunity. Some of the statutes now being used to put away miscreants were enacted by Ms Rousseff’s government.

One way of capturing this spirit would be for the country to hold fresh elections. A new president might have a mandate to embark on reforms that have eluded governments for decades. Voters also deserve a chance to rid themselves of the entire corruption-infested Congress. Only new leaders and new legislators can undertake the fundamental reforms that Brazil needs, in particular an overhaul of the corruption-prone political system and of uncontrolled public spending, which pushes up debt and hobbles growth.

Second best
True enough, the path to renewal through the ballot box is strewn with obstacles. Given its record, Congress is unlikely to pass the constitutional amendment required to dissolve itself and hold an early general election. The electoral tribunal could order a new presidential ballot, on the ground that Petrobras bribe money helped finance the re-election of Ms Rousseff and Mr Temer in 2014. But that is far from certain.

There is thus a good chance that Brazil will be condemned to muddle on under the current generation of discredited leaders. Its voters should not forget this moment. Because, in the end, they will have a chance to go to the polls—and they should use it to vote for something better.


Congresso DO BRASIL tem assistido a algumas cenas bizarras em seu tempo. Em 1963, um senador apontou uma arma para o seu arqui-inimigo e matou outro senador por engano. Em 1998, uma proposta de lei fundamental falhou quando um congressista apertou o botão errado em seu dispositivo de votação electrónica. Mas o espetáculo na Câmara em 17 de abril certamente conta entre os mais estranhos. Um por um, 511 deputados apresentou no sentido de um microfone lotado e, em rajadas de dez segundos transmitidos a uma nação extasiada, votado o impeachment do presidente, Dilma Rousseff. Alguns foram envolto em bandeiras do Brasil. Um lançou um foguete confete. Muitos dedicatórias jorravam para suas cidades de origem, religião, animal de estimação faz-e até mesmo corretores de seguros do Brasil. O movimento de transmitir as acusações contra Dilma ao Senado para o julgamento passou por 367 votos a 137, com sete abstenções.

A votação ocorre em um momento de desespero. O Brasil está lutando com sua pior recessão desde a década de 1930. PIB deverá diminuir em 9% a partir do segundo trimestre de 2014, quando a recessão começou, até o fim deste ano. A inflação e a taxa de desemprego estão a cerca de 10%.

O fracasso não é apenas da tomada de Rousseff. toda a classe política tenha deixado o país para baixo através de uma combinação de negligência e corrupção. Os líderes do Brasil não vai reconquistar o respeito de seus cidadãos ou superar os problemas da economia menos que haja uma limpeza completa.

Amaragem Dilma
A votação de domingo não foi o fim da Dilma, mas sua saída não pode agora estar longe. O Brasil não deveria chorar por ela. Incompetência em seu primeiro mandato, 2011-2014, tornou difícil situação económica do país incomparavelmente pior. O partido dos seus Trabalhadores (PT) é uma força motriz por trás de um esquema de corrupção gigantesca centrada na Petrobras, a companhia estatal de petróleo, que canalizou o dinheiro de empreiteiros para políticos e partidos. Embora Dilma não tenha sido pessoalmente implicados no delito, ela tentou proteger seu antecessor como presidente, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, da acusação.

O que é alarmante é que aqueles que estão trabalhando para o seu afastamento são, em muitos aspectos piores. Se o Senado vota para colocá-la em julgamento, provavelmente em meados de maio, Dilma terá que se afastar por até 180 dias. O vice-presidente, Michel Temer, que vem de um partido diferente, vai assumir e servir a seu mandato se o Senado remove-la do cargo (ver artigo). Sr. Temer pode fornecer alívio econômico de curto prazo. Ao contrário do infeliz Rousseff, ele sabe como fazer as coisas de Brasília e seu Partido do Movimento Democrático Brasileiro (PMDB) é mais amigável aos negócios do que o PT.

Mas o PMDB está irremediavelmente comprometida, também. Um de seus líderes é o orador da Câmara, Eduardo Cunha, que presidiu espetáculo impeachment de seis horas de domingo e ele próprio foi acusado pelo tribunal supremo, com aceitar subornos através do sistema Petrobras. Ao anunciar os seus votos "não", alguns dos aliados de Rousseff denunciou Cunha como um "gangster" e um "ladrão".

A mancha de corrupção está espalhada por muitos partidos brasileiros. Dos 21 deputados sob investigação no caso da Petrobras, 16 votaram pelo impeachment de Rousseff. Cerca de 60% dos congressistas enfrentar acusações de delito criminal.

Não há maneiras rápidas de colocar esse direito. As raízes da disfunção política do Brasil voltar para a economia baseada no escravo do século 19, a ditadura no dia 20 e um sistema eleitoral viciado que tanto faz campanhas ruinosamente caro e também protege os políticos de conta.

No curto prazo, impeachment não vai consertar isso. A acusação de que é a base para tentar Rousseff, que ela manipulou contas no ano passado para fazer o déficit fiscal pareça menor do que era há-é tão pequena que apenas um punhado de congressistas se preocuparam em mencionar isso em seus dez segundos tiradas. Se Rousseff é deposto por uma questão técnica, o Sr. Temer vai lutar para ser visto como um presidente legítimo pela grande minoria de brasileiros que ainda apoiar Dilma.

Crescente e minguante: problemas econômicos do Brasil, em gráficos
Em qualquer outro país, tal cocktail de declínio económico e conflito político pode ser combustível. Contudo, o Brasil tem reservas notáveis ​​de tolerância. Dividido como eles estão sobre os erros e acertos de impeachment, os brasileiros têm mantido a sua raiva sob controle. Nas últimas três décadas sugerem que a deles é um país que pode suportar uma crise sem recorrer a golpes ou colapsos. E aqui, talvez, é um pingo de esperança.

O fato de que o escândalo Petrobras tem enredado alguns dos políticos e empresários mais poderosos do país é um sinal de que algumas instituições, especialmente aqueles que cumprir a lei, estão amadurecendo. Um dos motivos políticos estão de tal problema é que uma nova e melhor instruídos e mais assertiva classe média se recusou a colocar-se com sua impunidade. Alguns dos estatutos agora a ser utilizados para arrumar meliantes foram promulgadas pelo governo de Dilma Rousseff.

Uma maneira de captar esse espírito seria para o país a realizar novas eleições. Um novo presidente poderia ter um mandato para embarcar em reformas que escapavam aos governos durante décadas. Os eleitores também merecem uma chance de livrar-se de todo o Congresso infestado de corrupção. Apenas novos líderes e novos legisladores podem realizar as reformas fundamentais que o Brasil necessita, em especial, uma reforma do sistema político corrupção propensas e da despesa pública descontrolada, o que empurra para cima dívida e atrapalha o crescimento.

Segundo melhor
É verdade, o caminho para a renovação através das urnas está cheio de obstáculos. Dado o seu registro, o Congresso é improvável para passar a emenda constitucional obrigado a dissolver-se e realizar uma eleição geral antecipada. O tribunal eleitoral poderia ordenar um novo escrutínio presidencial, com o fundamento de que a Petrobras suborno dinheiro ajudou a financiar a re-eleição de Dilma e Temer Sr. em 2014. Mas isso está longe de ser certo.

Assim, há uma boa chance de que o Brasil vai ser condenado à confusão sobre sob a atual geração de líderes desacreditados. Seus eleitores não se deve esquecer este momento. Porque, no final, eles terão a chance de ir às urnas-e devem usá-lo para votar em algo melhor.


Commentary :



ANATEL está tentando restringir a liberdade de comunicação e educação, restringindo o acesso a Internet.

ANATEL está tentando restringir a liberdade de comunicação e educação, restringindo o acesso a Internet.

ANATEL está tentando restringir a liberdade de comunicação e educação entre os mais pobres na sociedade brasileira, fazendo as taxas e as condições de acesso à Internet não aceitáveis para milhões de usuários. Qual é o ponto de dar aos estudantes cadernos livres, a fim de continuar a sua educação, se eles não podem dar ao luxo de usá-los? Esta é uma'GOLPE' pela estatal ANATEL ao aço ainda mais dinheiro do povo, a fim de tentar substituir seus furtos'Lava Jato' de fundos públicos. Eu também suspeito fortemente outro motivo de reduzir os povos acessar para protestar contra o comportamento do governo não-ético. Junte-se a nós em um NOOOOO alto !! ao nosso sagrado, Internet gratuita em todo o mundo.


ANATEL is trying to restrict the freedom of communication and education among the poorest in Brazilian society by making the charges and conditions of Internet access non-acceptable to millions of users. What is the point of giving students free notebooks in order to further their education if they cannot afford to use them?  This is a ´GOLPE´ by state owned ANATEL to steel yet more money from the people, in order to try replacing their ´Lava Jato´ thefts from public funds. I also strongly suspect another motive of reducing the peoples access to protest against non-ethical government behavior. Join us in a loud NOOOOO !! to restrict our sacred, world-wide FREE   Internet.




Declaração feita pelo Presidente 24 de setembro de 2013:

"O momento é propício para criar as condições para prevenir o ciberespaço de ser usado como uma arma de guerra, através de espionagem, sabotagem e ataques contra os sistemas e infra-estrutura de outros países", disse o presidente brasileiro.

(Talvez ANATEL está agora a criação de uma rede interna para filtrar e controlar conteúdos de Internet antes que ele atinja a rede de fornecedores brasileiros?)

Statement made by the President 24 Sept. 2013 :

"The time is ripe to create the conditions to prevent cyberspace from being used as a weapon of war, through espionage, sabotage and attacks against systems and infrastructure of other countries," the Brazilian president said. 

(Perhaps ANATEL is now setting up an internal network to filter and control Internet contents before it reaches the Brazilian network providers?)



Saudi cover-up proves US government complicit in 9/11 terror attacks


Saudi cover-up proves US government complicit in 9/11 terror attacks

Mikael Thalen - APRIL 18, 2016 840 Comments
INFOWARS  April 18, 2016

Among the numerous views held by those espousing “9/11 truth,” one central idea remains the same: The United States government is complicit in the September 11, 2001 terror attacks.

An article in the New York Post this week, boldly titled “How US covered up Saudi role in 9/11,” details how the highest levels of the US government not only helped conceal Saudi involvement but assisted the perpetrators in escaping the country.

The Cover-upNYPost

“The kingdom’s involvement was deliberately covered up at the highest levels of our government. And the coverup goes beyond locking up 28 pages of the Saudi report in a vault in the US Capitol basement,” Paul Sperry writes. “Investigations were throttled. Co-conspirators were let off the hook.”

Everyone from Join Terrorism Task Force members to FBI agents and Virginia law enforcement say that despite evidence leading to the Saudi Embassy in Washington, investigations were derailed repeatedly by higher ups.

“Those sources say the pages missing from the 9/11 congressional inquiry report — which comprise the entire final chapter dealing with ‘foreign support for the September 11 hijackers’ — details ‘incontrovertible evidence’ gathered from both CIA and FBI case files of official Saudi assistance for at least two of the Saudi hijackers who settled in San Diego.”

NBC NEWS latest on the 9/11 :>

The Saudi Connection

One name specifically, that of Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar, commonly known as “Bandar Bush” due to his longtime relationship with the president, came up frequently during investigations.

“Some information has leaked from the redacted section, including a flurry of pre-9/11 phone calls between one of the hijackers’ Saudi handlers in San Diego and the Saudi Embassy, and the transfer of some $130,000 from then-Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar’s family checking account to yet another of the hijackers’ Saudi handlers in San Diego,” Sperry continues.

Upon learning of the agent’s knowledge, State Department officials responded not by detaining Bandar, but by providing him with round-the-clock protection.

“An investigator who worked with the JTTF in Washington complained that instead of investigating Bandar, the US government protected him — literally,” the article says. “He said the State Department assigned a security detail to help guard Bandar not only at the embassy, but also at his McLean, Va., mansion.”

Former FBI agent John Guandolo, a Washington field agent who investigated Bandar following 9/11, says the Saudi should have undoubtedly been treated as a suspect.

“The Saudi ambassador funded two of the 9/11 hijackers through a third party,” Guandolo said. “He should be treated as a terrorist suspect, as should other members of the Saudi elite class who the US government knows are currently funding the global jihad.”

The Getaway
The article goes on to state that just two days after the attack, Bandar visited the White House to enjoy several cigars with President Bush before being granted safe passage out of the country with other Saudis.

“After he met on Sept. 13, 2001, with President Bush in the White House, where the two old family friends shared cigars on the Truman Balcony, the FBI evacuated dozens of Saudi officials from multiple cities, including at least one Osama bin Laden family member on the terror watch list,” Sperry says. “Instead of interrogating the Saudis, FBI agents acted as security escorts for them, even though it was known at the time that 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi citizens.”


Then-White House adviser Richard Clarke also stated in 2003 that he aided the Saudis escape after being assured by FBI agents that they had been cleared of wrongdoing.

“The adviser, Richard Clarke, who ran the White House crisis team after the attacks but has since left the Bush administration, said he agreed to the extraordinary plan because the Federal Bureau of Investigation assured him that the departing Saudis were not linked to terrorism,” Times writer Eric Lichtblau stated.

The Saudi Panic
In response to growing knowledge of the Saudi’s role, the Islamic kingdom has threatened to “sell up to $750 billion in treasury securities and other assets in the United States” if legislation backing the release of the 28 pages is passed.

“Adel al-Jubeir, the Saudi foreign minister, delivered the kingdom’s message personally last month during a trip to Washington, telling lawmakers that Saudi Arabia would be forced to sell up to $750 billion in treasury securities and other assets in the United States before they could be in danger of being frozen by American courts,” writes The New York Times.

Although such information is devastating to the US, Saudi Arabia and the “official story” of September 11, much of it has been public since the years following the attack.

The Other Whistleblowers

Largely ignored by the press is the countless other government officials who also say they experienced similar treatment when trying to investigate America’s largest ever terror attack.

Former NSA senior executive Thomas Drake, who blew the whistle on domestic surveillance during the Bush presidency, has commented repeatedly on NSA intelligence that would have “undoubtedly” stopped 9/11.

“The NSA had critical intelligence about Al Qaeda and associated movements in particular that had never been properly shared outside of NSA,” Drake said in 2014. “They simply did not share critical intelligence although they had it.”

Former senior intelligence officer Lt. Col Anthony Shaffer was similarly sidelined by the Defense Intelligence Agency for blowing the whistle on covered up operations that identified two terrorist cells later charged for the 9/11 attacks.

"I had no intention of joining the ranks of ‘whistle blowers,’” Shaffer said in 2009. “When I made my disclosure to the 9/11 commission regarding the existence of a pre 9/11 offensive counter-terrorism operation that had discovered several of the 9/11 terrorists a full year before the 9/11 attacks my intention was to simply tell the truth, and fulfill my oath of office.” Shaffer also joined the Alex Jones Show well over one year ago to discuss the Saudi’s role in 9/11 and the 28 pages.

Former FBI wiretap translator Sibel Edmonds, who had access to top-secret communications, also stated in 2004 that the FBI had detailed 9/11 foreknowledge that specifically mentioned a terrorist attack involving airplanes.

“We should have had orange or red-type of alert in June or July of 2001. There was that much information available,” Edmonds said. “There was specific information about use of airplanes, that an attack was on the way two or three months beforehand and that several people were already in the country by May of 2001. They should’ve alerted the people to the threat we’re facing.”

9/11 Truth & The 2016 Election
The 28 pages are now so mainstream that presidential candidates are being forced to find a stance on the topic. The first candidate to touch the subject was none other than Republican front-runner Donald J. Trump, who earlier this year pointed the finger at Saudi Arabia.

“But it wasn’t the Iraqis, you will find out who really knocked down the World Trade Center,” Trump said at a campaign event in Bluffton, South Carolina. “Because they have papers in there that are very secret, you may find it’s the Saudis, okay? But you will find out.”

Other candidates have been less forward.

Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton refused to say Monday whether she had even seen the 28 pages at all. “I am not commenting,” she said.

Although Clinton has remained tight-lipped, her and fellow Democrat Bernie Sanders are backing legislation that would allow families of loved ones killed in the 9/11 attacks to sue the Saudi government. “Obviously, we’ve got to make anyone who participates in or supports terrorism pay a price, and we also have to be aware of any consequences that might affect Americans, either military or civilian or our nation,” Clinton told ABC.

The Obama administration has threatened to veto the bill.

“It could put the United States and our taxpayers and our service members and our diplomats at significant risk if other countries were to adopt a similar law,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters Monday.

“Given the long list of concerns I have expressed … it’s difficult to imagine a scenario in which the president would sign the bill as it’s currently drafted,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest told reporters.

Before dropping out, Republican Jeb Bush was confronted twice by Infowars reporters on the Saudi link.

“Ya, I’d like to see em,” Bush said. “You got ’em?”

Jeb again quipped during the second encounter, asking if the reporter could supply him with a copy.

“You haven’t sent ’em to me,” Jeb said. “I don’t know anything about ’em man.”

Regardless of one’s exact theory on the details of 9/11, it’s time for Americans and people around the world to admit they were lied to.

The “9/11 truthers” were right



David Rockefeller, at a 1991 Bilderberger meeting

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

---David Rockefeller




NAV betalte ut til sammen 6,8 milliarder kroner til personer bosatt i utlandet i fjor.

Nav betalte ut 6,8milliarder kroner til personer bosatt i utlandet i fjor. 

Det var flest norske pensjonister som mottok penger

Publisert: NAV 14 april 2016

I alt 83.609 personer i utlandet mottok Nav-penger i løpet av 2015.

– Personer bosatt i utlandet mottok 6,8 milliarder kroner fra Nav i 2015. Selv om det er mye penger, så utgjør det mindre enn 2 prosent av våre samlede utbetalinger i løpet av et år, sier ytelsesdirektør Kjersti Monland i Nav i en pressemelding.

I alt 1,7 prosent av de samlede utbetalingene fra Nav i 2015 gikk til personer bosatt i utlandet. Utenlandske statsborgere som ikke er bosatt i Norge, var mottakere av 0,6 prosent av utbetalingene.

Over halvparten av utbetalingene, nesten 3,8 milliarder kroner, er alderspensjon. Deretter følger uføretrygd med over 1,5 milliarder i 2015. De fleste mottakerne i disse kategoriene er norske statsborgere.

Mest penger utbetales til Sverige, med over 2,3 milliarder kroner. Videre kommer Spania, dit Nav overfører 797 millioner, hovedsakelig til norske mottakere. I alt 361 millioner kroner overføres til mottakere i Polen. Her er bare 11 prosent av utbetalingene til norske statsborgere.

Henholdsvis 177 og 46 millioner kroner ble utbetalt i dagpenger og kontantstøtte til utlandet. For dagpenger er 89 prosent av mottakerne utenlandske statsborgere og bare 7 prosent er kvinner. Forholdet for mottakere av kontantstøtte er at 85 prosent av mottakerne er utenlandske statsborgere og halvparten av overføringene skjer til Polen.

I 2014 betalte Nav ut 6,2 milliarder til utlandet. (©NTB)6,8 milliarder Nav-kroner til utlandet i fjor
Nav betalte ut til sammen 6,8 milliarder kroner til personer bosatt i utlandet i fjor. Det var flest norske pensjonister som mottok penger.

– Personer bosatt i utlandet mottok 6,8 milliarder kroner fra Nav i 2015. Selv om det er mye penger, så utgjør det mindre enn 2 prosent av våre samlede utbetalinger i løpet av et år, sier ytelsesdirektør Kjersti Monland i Nav i en pressemelding.

I alt 1,7 prosent av de samlede utbetalingene fra Nav i 2015 gikk til personer bosatt i utlandet. Utenlandske statsborgere som ikke er bosatt i Norge, var mottakere av 0,6 prosent av utbetalingene.

Over halvparten av utbetalingene, nesten 3,8 milliarder kroner, er alderspensjon. Deretter følger uføretrygd med over 1,5 milliarder i 2015. De fleste mottakerne i disse kategoriene er norske statsborgere.

Mest penger utbetales til Sverige, med over 2,3 milliarder kroner. Videre kommer Spania, dit Nav overfører 797 millioner, hovedsakelig til norske mottakere. I alt 361 millioner kroner overføres til mottakere i Polen. Her er bare 11 prosent av utbetalingene til norske statsborgere.

Henholdsvis 177 og 46 millioner kroner ble utbetalt i dagpenger og kontantstøtte til utlandet. For dagpenger er 89 prosent av mottakerne utenlandske statsborgere og bare 7 prosent er kvinner. Forholdet for mottakere av kontantstøtte er at 85 prosent av mottakerne er utenlandske statsborgere og halvparten av overføringene skjer til Polen.

I 2014 betalte Nav ut 6,2 milliarder til utlandet. (©NTB)



Interessant statistikk for arkivering.

"I alt 1,7 prosent av de samlede utbetalingene fra Nav i 2015 gikk til personer bosatt i utlandet. Utenlandske statsborgere som ikke er bosatt i Norge, var mottakere av 0,6 prosent av utbetalingene."

M.a.o.  nesten 50/50.   1.1% etniske nordmenn  og  0.6% utenlandske statsborgere bosatt i utlandet.



Republicans Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump are both fighting the power of the global elite

Republicans Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump are both fighting the power of the global elite

A new study out of Tufts University torpedoes glowing estimates of the latest such deal, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The study authors predict the consequences: another 450,000 jobs will be lost in the US by 2025. Oops. Another Globalist trade treaty sucks life out of the American economy. Which is precisely why Obama is obsessed with passing it.

(The study is titled “Trading Down: Unemployment, Inequality and Other Risks of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement.” A quick breakdown of the study is, here; free access to the full paper is on, here)

Bilderberg and the Council on Foreign Relations and Rockefeller Globalists are counting on the TPP. It’s one of their precious babies. They want to undermine the US economy.It’s part of their sink-America program, to pave the way for One United Planet under one management system. Not an American empire. A globalist empire.

And they don’t want some out-of-control US Presidential candidate, whose crowds and poll numbers keep swelling like a massive infection, to swipe and swipe and swipe at these trade treaties and dream up ways to bring more jobs back home. They definitely don’t want that—especially after their current marionette in the White House has done such fine work drowning the economic life of the US. The issuance of new credit cards and part-time work at fast-food joints pouring chocolate on French fries don’t equal renewed prosperity, in case you were fooled by official economic-indicator reports.

These elite Globalist don’t believe for a minute that Trump alone can turn back the clock on their ongoing destruction. But they do realize he can keep talking about it. And in doing so, he can force more people to wake up to the fact that they’re being screwed—and how they’re being screwed.

Globalism is all about allowing mega-corporations to take their factories and jobs out of the country overseas. It’s a cornerstone of every trade deal. Mega-corps can manufacture their products more cheaply in a hell hole with slave workers, and then export those products back here (and to other industrialized countries)—and pay no tariffs. How sweet (and destructive) it is.

Trump, like some swaggering cowboy, keeps shooting his six-guns at this program, even though he doesn’t apparently understand the bottom-line motivation behind it. Or who knows? Maybe he does and he’s staying silent about it.

How did this guy get in the door? Why can’t the media shut up about him? Why does every attack against him, valid or invalid, bring more supporters to his side? What happened to Globalist Jeb? Why is he curled up in fetal position in his bedroom eating Snickers and watching home movies of his family?

Hillary is on board with the Globalist program. She’s all about cold-blooded revenge against the greatest number of people possible. She eats attacks against her, and converts them into dark anti-matter.

But Trump? He’s Mr. Brassy Salesman who parlayed his con and his bankruptcies and his execrable TV show into a fortune. And then he somehow got a few actual ideas into his oversized head. How? Why? Can’t somebody put him on a no-fly list? Can’t he be declared a terrorist or at least a national security risk? Can’t the NSA cough up a few juicy tidbits about his personal life? Haven’t the FBI or the CIA already slipped a few slimeballs into his campaign? There are spies who spy on spies spying on other spies, and they can’t squeeze out one rank and repulsive fact that’ll sink Trump’s ship?

In his 2003 Memoirs, David Rockefeller wrote:

Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.

Are we going to let darling David, who’s what, 175 years old now, go to his grave hearing the absurd burlesque echoes of Donald Trump ringing in his ears?

What used to be called the Eastern Establishment—Globalist Ivy League domeheads gazing at the world through the wrong ends of telescopes from Park Avenue penthouses—are in a Trump quandary. They’re disturbed. They have incipient ass-rash and stress-shingles. The natural order of things is wobbling.

Shut this Momzer up!

The permanent underclass must expand.

Economic chaos must prevail, so a new order can be instituted.

Mega-corporations must rule the world (for a while).

The Globalist hope is this: Eventually, Trump will be discredited as a goofball; and therefore, for the foreseeable future, no one else with any clout will raise the issue of trade treaties or the destruction of economies. Trump and whatever he stood for will be remembered as a flash in the pan, a one-hit wonder.

Globalism, as it moves forward, will become a forgotten word.

And the band will play on.

Understand: there are two basic stripes of Globalist. The first is America-first. They want a single managed planet, but they want the US to be the top-boss in the crime empire. The second, as evidenced by the Rockefeller quote above, and by the core international membership of Bilderberg heavy hitters, want shared leadership. The balance is delicate, and the conflict is real. As it moves forward, the last thing both types of Globalists want is some yahoo stepping into the frame and disrupting the whole show.

Trump’s qualifications for the Presidency, such as they are, are entirely beside this point. Whether he was originally put front and center to serve as a losing foil for Hillary Clintonis also, now, beside the point. He’s acquired too much support. As far as the Globalists are concerned, he is a problem.

Perhaps the polls are all wrong and the Primary season will douse the glow on his candle, and by the time the July Republican convention rolls around he’ll be back in New York wheeling and dealing real estate. They hope. There’s a chance no candidate will have enough votes for a slam-dunk nomination in Cleveland, in which case the process will be “brokered,” as they say. Jeb could then exert his power and play his cards behind the scene. But that would cause a major uproar among Trump’s supporters as they cry foul and raise hell, igniting a new nightmare.

Hillary’s inner circle might still be in the process of building up Trump, because they continue to believe he’ll be an easy mark in the election—but it seems late in the game for such a reckless assessment, given how far Trump has come in the last few months.

If some hidden ally is trying to help Trump stay afloat, he might also have non-Globalist convictions. Who, besides China (already in Trump’s crosshairs), is the biggest outsider vis-à-vis free trade? Who is angrily opposing the upcoming Globalist TTIP trade deal, which would cement tighter relations between the European Union and the US and make him even more of an outsider? Who has already expressed admiration for Trump and received kind words from The Donald? Yes, this is mere speculation, but there is one man who fits that bill:

Vladimir Putin. And Putin certainly took notice, last year, when the-hawk-Hillary compared him to, let’s see, who was that again, oh yes, Hitler.

Real estate cowboy and KGB lieutenant colonel? Different galaxies, but they have at least one thing in common: they like believing they’re the toughest guy in the room. Do they both like war too much?

As for the Republican party bosses, they’re going crazy trying to derail Trump. Their main argument seems to be: he’s not a legitimate candidate. But behind that, their actual concern comes back to their own membership in the Globalist club. By allowing Trump to maintain center stage, they’re violating every club rule. And the men who own them aren’t happy. Not happy at all. So these party big shots are backing away from Trump as far as they can, swearing loudly: “See, he’s not our man! Honest, we hate him! He’s a fiend! We want to fire him!”

But so far, Trump still has a patent on that phrase: “You’re fired!”

National politics and international politics are rigged games from top to bottom. But once in a while, a wild one turns up. That person may have started out as just another piece of the fix, but then he breaks away from the pack and stakes out his own territory. When this happens, he’s usually squelched long before he can build up a head of steam. But not now, not in this case.

The horse is out of the barn. And he’s not sprinting for the horizon. He’s prancing and dancing in the pasture. He’s rearing up on his hind legs, he’s jumping, he’s kicking up his heels. He’s doing whatever he wants to. And that’s the key, because the rest of the horses have long since been trained to act like machines. People know the difference. If given the choice, they move to the wild one. He reminds them that they, too, have been socialized to become machines. And they want out.

Yes, there is an definite upside and a downside to this shock and surprise and unpredicted circumstance. But regardless, it’s a fact. It’s happening.

People might wish the wild one was a Caruso or a Nijinsky or an Olivier or a Lincoln or a Tom Paine or a Gandhi—instead of a fast-talking self-promoting New York real estate hustler, who suddenly flips a switch and wants to go to war.

But in a machine world, strange things happen.

When the mandated pattern for all social behavior is cracked and broken and smashed, strange creatures emerge on stage, under the lights. However distorted they may seem, the audience suddenly pays attention, sniffing something they barely remember, but desperately want.

Does the creature dancing across the footlights accurately reflect the audience’s desire? It doesn’t matter to the audience. Because the thing most wished for, and most precious, is an article called freedom.

Will some people misinterpret what it means? You bet they will. They’ll say it’s license. They’ll do all sorts of crazy things with it.

When governments and corporations and media agents keep reshaping the world into new versions of locked-down conformity and robot behaviorism, the breakout will never be smooth.

—The original crime is the individual surrendering his own uniqueness, his own mind, his own imagination, his own formidable power. That’s where it started, and that’s where it comes back to.

Shrugging off inner slavery, across a whole population, and regressing in fear back to the mean, and breaking out again, are more than most people can handle.

But for those who can grasp the core of it, a new dawn rises. And things will never be the same again.


Interesting evaluation of the disappearing middle classes :>



The global elite (Illuminati-Bilderberg) are dead scared of 3 forthcoming major events>

1. The US Presidential election. The people of the world have only ONE option, TRUMP..

2. The UK BREXIT election in June. The people of the world have only ONE option. BREXIT..

3. The European migration flood is being reversed.  PEACE in Syria is the peoples option.

The global elite,including President Obama,Prime Minister Cameron, The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Bank of England and a multitude of rich owners of conglomerates, all are putting pressure
on the people of the UK to remain in the European Union,making scaremongery for BREXIT.

Britain has survived many storms in the past and will rise again to former power regardless of EU

BREXIT is ESSENTIAL, to break the global elite´s devastating plans for The New World Order.