The Otium Post

The Otium Post




February 11, 2013 at 7:11pm
Ingunn Røiseland, with good use of Kjell Erik Midtgård

A new perspective on Economics: Sakli vs One People's Public Trust

Nothing is as it seems to be everywhere you turn your gaze. What we today call "economy" is in reality a bad powered casinos. Welcome to the rabbit hole where truth outstrips imagination.

This is a story that is beyond anything it is possible to imagine, and which, if true, has the power to liberate us from corruption, poverty, humiliation and confinement. It is based on the story of Adnan Sakli and are intended to form a backdrop to evaluate the many other initiatives that we've seen in the past, in particular, I think of One People's Public Trust:

Even in our country, which many think of as one of the best in the world, we live with the financial parameters that most people know the consequence of: 85% true tax pressure and minimum return in the form of public goods. In the following, I take aim at showing how it went for us in reality using our lives to working for the State, which is the private banking Department agents.

This article will largely be about how financial institutions, transactions and ownership are completely different organized than at least i thought so far, and how the circumstances surrounding the "Trust" and "Positions of Prime" can record on a radical view.

Until a short while ago, I thought that I had a certain overview of most financial institutions/ ownership relationships, I thought the Federal Reserve largely order was rewarding and I thought that much was all about fractional reserve banking, fiatpengesystemet and private ownership. It also, however, new insights have turned major cracks in this paradigm, and has shown that the degree of secrecy and deception is much more comprehensive, generalized and systematized than I ever have on my part No. I just spoke with a girl who had taken a master's degree in "Trust Law", and she said the same thing. She said, "no one would have believed me if I said that all significant transactions taking place in Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Cayman Islands and Switzerland, and has money laundering transactions as the primary purpose".

So, what happened that changed everything?

In 1987 the World Bank went bankrupt, and all of the global central banking systems experienced a crack. One person in the world had real capital enough to take ownership by the Bank of International Settlements, under what's called Statutory Act. BIS is the Bank that lends to the central banks.
Under what is called The reserve solvency regulations "were all government bonds, commercial loans, ownership of all central banks into the same account in the BIS. The man who was the owner of BIS, and also by all other accounts, named Adnan Sakli and he explains it this way:

« So by their arrogance and with the position of the reserve laws, I became the owner of everything by the fact that I was a free person with no obligations and maximum liquidity. Then it just snow balled over and over, and the law and my lack of criminality and their greed made me even stronger to a point where they could not do anything against me.»

He also says, in other words, when the Rothschild m / multi withdrew liquidity / money supply out of the market and the business collapsed, this transmitted up through the food chain, so that banks also went bowled-over. In these banks sent stress signals that they had not strength to cope with this, they drove for creditor bill and they will then creditor property. Bankruptcy fire engulfed central banks and major financial companies on Wall Street and London City, right up to the BIS (Bank of International Settlement). In this inferno, it was only a bank that had solidity enough to take over the BIS and it was Sakli its bank.

This means that Adnan Sakli own Norwegian government debt, -Norwegian MTNs and sovereign bonds- and can cancel it if certain requirements can be met. He also owns Rothschilds accounts, Vatican accounts etc. He also says that «That is how I became the Underwriter of the world, Master trader, The sovereign, the Prime, etc,- plus the Vatican does not have anything legal because I am the Prime and the Vatican has to get its authority from the prime and to date it has not.» Adnan Sakli & The Global Debt Holder, Seegolam Naipaul

If this is true then there is also the implication that the Norwegian Government and Norwegian banks drifter illegitimately.

Clean-up in your mind the first step:

The first step towards understanding these implications would need to be a willingness to ask basic questions, and to be established thought patterns after the seams. It is important to understand that the media's mission is the dissemination of information, but rather to support and maintain the common notion of how things hang together. You can not assume that the content of this article coincides with what you can read about in normal media, but you can even search all references and claims online. You have the responsibility to evaluate the information.

I would like to mention just one example of how the media's main job is to keep the illusion and old programming in place: one of Norway's foremost research and economic priorities right now, carbon capture and storage:

If you go to delve into this topic then you will hopefully be able to quickly see that the idea of man-made warming is mytemakeri and not reality; This is a matter of "global governance" way beyond "global climate".

If you read about "anthropogenic global warming" fraud "or" climategate ", then you will quickly see that all elementary pieces of understanding be omitted by the media. None the less continues the discourse in the media and among politicians as if nothing; We "hang" in an outdated paradigm and pretend as if the lie is the truth as long as it goes, and as long as it can still be appropriated billions of billions of junk, air, nothing. It will of course mean that the emperor as Stoltenberg 's, has long been very naked, and that it would save the State budget for the huge expenses if we could see it.
In the following I will try to sum up how the economic landscape now looks like from my point of view. However, I'm open to all suggestions and always ready to correct what is wrong.

Some basic legal questions we need to ask ourselves:

Laws and the legal system works within a society, constitute a sort of "wrap" that keeps the community together, within certain limits, and not so many question how legislation gets its authority from

For example, many of us have taken for granted that the Constitution amounts to the first position, and that it is not possible to invoke any higher law than the Constitution. What should we,-basic questions about legitimacy and jurisdiction provides the key to understanding how the world works and how you can be free, if it is that you want.

Some questions we can ask ourselves is what is the first position, there is no type-jurisdiction or trade-off that override other underlying legislation? Is it true that the world is ruled as a "Trust" – who are so, "Trustee" and who is it that "the Entruster"?

If it should turn out to vote that all governments really are corporations, which I think, who are then we in this picture? Does it have any other owners korporasjonen Norway than what we are accustomed to believe? If so, purely hypothetically, would prove that the Vatican owns korporasjonen Norway, wouldn't it have been great if it turns out that someone else with better intentions owns the Vatican, who claims that he makes Sakli?

Vatican claims itself to be "entrusted" by God, not just spiritual and symbolic, but real and political, and the Vatican's financial dealings as well as many pavebuller reflects this ambition:

These are topics that everyone should dig in on their own. The rule of thumb is that most of the basic important information is hidden, and deliberately made inaccessible. Two simple examples of many: what is the company? Who owns the IMF?

So some financial issues:

What exactly happens with the global economy? Where is all that money? If we have used them up so someone must have earned them. what causes that not government debt can be matched against other countries ' debts and thus are offset?  Why is there a large scale robbery of resources such as water, electricity and other commodities, and why people for their past tynes kroner in the form of bailouts of banks, inflaterte market that allows the House and home also be attributed to the banks, tax increases at levels that no one should have to put up with while overførslene to warfare and "humanitarian purpose" is not subject to critical review. What is the real relationship between law and Economics? Is there anything BI and NHH forgot to tell?

The starting point for understanding the economy today:

After the stock market crash of 1929 eventually went the Western States bankrupt and was forced to start with borrowing from international sentralbankiere in order to finance the tasks the State had taken on. The population was posed as security for loans, and our future tax-bearing ability became the basis for valuation.  If you are Googling "yield" or "Norwegian sovereign bonds"

( then you will be able to quickly determine that it is the people's freshwater towers, which are the product, so when Norway buying up Greek or Spanish Government bonds these days, so they simply buy slaves on the cheap sale for our money

The establishment of institutions such as social security numbers and Statistics Norway was necessary tools and it was also necessary to organize all Nations that corporations, so that it now no longer are Western Nations, only corporations. All international transactions are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code or a comparable, harmonised legal framework, and that is also why we are confident that the State has created a straw man's identity for us, even if all State agencies will deny that. the UCC is the only legislation that asks that names be uppercase, as on driver license:

Here is an example of obskurantismen around this theme; often an indicator that something is at stake:

Here's a video that explains this in simple rundown: v = jm9my4ujKrc

Here, as always, it is important that you do your own research.

If you are Googling AS Norway, up reasonable answer, then this is information being kept hidden. If you call a Ministry in hopes of getting answers, I think this is a bit futile, to say the least. The answer I got from the Law Department of the Ministry of Justice was that "a State is a State, it may not be registered as a corporate body" (I have to then understand). My experience is that it's of no use to call a political scientist at Blindern,-but here is a database that lists some of the Nations that are registered as corporations:

It is clear that in legal terms this grip provides "Nations" from scratch, as the nation/korporasjonen only relate to you by SSN, i.e. the legal straw man that has been created for you, and not to you as a living man; natural person. In Norway, there may be reason to look more closely at your tasks & mandate of a company such as:

The premise for the system to work as it does is solely that you agree to lend your straw man's identity to the korporasjonen (the nation) where pro forma is considered "employed". This straw man's system that makes it possible to issue Government bonds is the reason we have gone away from the credit economy that must have the backing of real assets.

When the World Bank, and thus the world community again went bankrupt in 1987, pass a value of transfers which so far has caused pain, but who has the ability to liberate us from the financial yoke and the threat of bankruptcy threatening the world. Sakli was seated as the formal owner of all of what we call "The global collateral", and has so far withstood oligarkiets attempt to collect all values in a few hands through to prevent redemption of bonds. Sakli says that it is the lack of access to funds for the oligarchy is the cause of desperation in the system that has allowed people to be squeezed to the last drop. Sakli tells that he at one point became so tired of the boundless corruption and lack of consideration in the top circles of the system that he began to block transactions. The first time I heard about Sakli because I read an article about a businessman who had been kidnapped and taken to the notary will in Rimini to obsessive-compulsive sign a payout of hundreds of billions:

Who gets to borrow the interest that is paid from taxes each year?

Until 1972 the Central operated the lending institutions continued with some backing in gold, but after petrodollaren came into the picture, the whole system is built up around "air", FIAT-money system, where values are not secured in any real beyond my & your safety.

Sakli tells including this: "Fiat money was created in WW1 to steal the Ottoman's assets. The German gold backed bonds were the first fiat money and the Germans never had any gold to support the bonds they issued to fight WW1 against the Ottomans.

"And the Safra family's were the ones who were in charge of the Ottoman Central bank that was in Lebanon, That was the reason why Israel invaded Lebanon in 1974 to steal the gold that was there."

We are the real resources.

An important premise is to understand that the whole economic system is based on the fact that you have taken out loans, guarantees, and that the State has taken out loans which you also guarantee via your skatteytende ability. It is the reason why one of the strictest punishment is in our society is tax evasion or false information on the tax return. We see that these are inflammable and highly topical theme, here we see the Government's latest initiative to push us in a biometric database, with appropriate legal implications:

Government bonds make up the mainstay of the international economy, and it is interesting to ask oneself who profit from it and why. Interest rates on Government borrowing poses enormous annual sums that are paid from taxes, for Germany-interest on government debt amounted to 69 billion euros in 2008. Here are some figures from the U.s. Treasury:

We know that virtually all the lending banks are privately owned, and what we really are witnessing, therefore, are the biggest safety transfers from taxpayers to an oligarchy that is already sitting on most of the Earth's resources. States ' debt often pointed to as the reason for the economic collapse that has already taken place and most likely will continue: html

Often directed against excessive consumption, targets private households and the irresponsible, but most often the exact opposite is the case. In Spain and Ireland had the debt been to return entirely to the Governments "may" baile out banks. In Ireland government debt increased from 11-23% between 2007-2012 and in Spain from 40-80% of GDP.

It is almost impossible to understand why countries with so much equity such as Norway fails to pay back its government debt. Here's what Norges Bank says about this: stability/government debt/why-did-it-Norwegian-State debt/

Norway paid 22, 6 billion in interest payments on government debt in 2011. Most likely to say this someone about how Governments have let themselves bind and commit to private bankiers, in the form of either to go along with legislation that makes it impossible for a State to "borrow" by itself, or in the form of direct pressure and threats. It therefore seems obvious that interest rates on government loans constitute a source of income that someone does not want to miss (above oligarchy) and the grave truth is that the State agrees that the relevant question is "why"?

If it turns out that the first position is Sakli, so does that mean that Norges Bank, the Norwegian Government, all the world's banks and institutions are acting illegally, but it also means that it is easier to see the reason behind the seemingly desperate economic policy.

Sakli relates that desperation in the system and the lack of access to funds, has allowed Governments and corporations have had to retrieve their funds from innovations; bailouts, "bubbles" (housing bubble etc), increased taxes, increased alcohol to "humanitarian interventions" etc.

That's partly why Sakli has filed a lawsuit against many countries ' Governments to cooperate in Liborskandalen (Governments/banker conspire against ordinary people through interest rate manipulation in order to "crack" a market, and then either buy the cheap sale afterwards, or confiscate):

Sakli explains that the main problem is that it has been established a during operation where Governments and banking institutions together conspire to override his authority as "Prime", and herein lies also the possibilities for us if this is true.

So can it be true? says Sakli, are there indications or evidence that supports what he says?

The premise for that to be hold in Saklis history, is that there must be a starting point for the law, all contractors derive their authority from, a so-called "First position of the Law", within the framework of "man made" laws. Sakli says his role is to represent "the first position of the law", and as such so is he "global underwriter". This was not the terms I knew before I got to know Sakli but a lot seem to suggest that the United Nations has actually appointed their own "underwriter", Ray C. Dam through a body called The Office of International Control, OITC Treasure, which claims to be the "Chartered under the UN charter control". It is important to be aware that Sakli operates within a universe of man made law, which essentially emanates from the Vatican. Interestingly enough, a constitutional amendment was made in section 2 the 21 May 2012, which our law universe was changed from being a Lutheran-Evangelical Christian-humanist to Catholic.

That means that if it is true that the UNITED NATIONS recognizes the need for a global signature, then it is about credibility Saklis set against the United Nations.

Wikipedia claims that the OITC is a seemingly elaborate fraudulent organization which claims to be associated with the United Nations and the The Federal Reserve , the central bank of the United States . ", but it turns out that the United Nations most likely to have been host for OITC on its Web site, even if it is deleted now: = JO93tyy1Bz0

This is more than interesting in light of the fact that that the entire tells Sakli underlying the structure of the Federal Reserve, The Committee of 300, the Vatican, King families etc, which we know are operating under the same agenda, has long sought to take control of what is called "the global collateral" in order to circumvent the Saklis signature. Many are asking today, their trust in The One Peoples ' Public Trust, which claims to have closed-"foreclosed"-all financial institutions; all of the old structure within the framework of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Even I don't know, but I follow the development with excitement
The fact that the United Nations will most likely have created their own global signaturholder should be seen in the light of this, and is understood as a strategy to be able to get in a position to manage the global collateral. "If you are not familiar with the background of United Nations creation, I recommend you to get a little background info on this:

We also know that many of the leaders of the United Nations, Ban Ki-Moon, Kofi Annan etc have been involved in heavy corruption cases. In the past, the one replaced the other, unveiling actors like Benjamin Fulford, David Wilcock, The White Dragon Society, Neil Keenan etc, and they have assumed the document like this:

The common denominator is that they support any United Nations agenda and Ray C Dams candidacy as global "underwriter". So then we have Sakli on one side and Ray c. Dam, UN, Keenan, Fulford etc on the other. One People's Public Trust is supported by the same actors.
Adnan Sakli emerges as the "good guy," "white hat" and have made numerous attempts at dialogue with many countries ' Governments to cancel government debt against that power be returned to the people, and agreements with institutions such as the IMF are broken, UN etc, which most people think of as the representatives of the world community and world peace, but which really stands for a cynicism that far exceeds what most can imagine. For more information on what our agreements with organizations such as the IMF, the WHO etc actually means for the transfer of sovereignty and the money, see this page: 

arguing that e.g. the IMF is owned by the u.s. Treasury, which in turn is owned by the Vatican.
It's more than interesting to ask oneself whether there is any link between the Vatican and Norwegian power structures, and whether our Government is required to "buy" up to 40% of the IMF, or if the acquisition isn't really something a yet another transfer to an elite that nourish themselves of our ignorance and indifference.
If it turns out that the Vatican owns Sakli, it clearly looks different. There's a lot of information out there on the Web that opposes the as I refer to here, so the premise is all the time that you have to trust yourself and do your own research. You can definitely not rely on newspapers, it should be fairly clear in due course.

Sakli tells himself that the world is ruled this way:

«The governments are under the control of the Royal structures like the Rome commission. The Royals control the mafia as their street operational people. Most of the organized crime is via the EU commission, House of lords, League of nations, and via the Unilateral agreement of the Global joint agreement with the triad, yakuza, various groups of mafia flags, The Black mafia, the Jewish mafia, the Italian mafia , the Albanian mafia, the Russian mafia, -all one way or another connected to the Royal families and their intelligence networks. The masons are a leadership of both the governmental and the street level operation. It all links to the drug trade and the arms deals.»

If this sounds unlikely, I would recommend Herman Berges articles on about the backdrop of the financial institutions belonging in Luxembourg, the Cayman Islands, Switzerland etc and who has money laundering from weapons and drug sales that sole purpose. Herman Berge sits on a unique and pioneering expertise, and has time and again been attempted gagged brutallyWhat we therefore are witnessing today is the systematic crime implemented by international financial institutions, politicians and royal families. Which actors who actually participate in this is a bit unclear, but attendance at Bilderberg Meetings is not a good indicator.

This has now say about Sakli Leo Wanta Fund

The 1.5 trillion is a short term fix that will be eaten up as soon as it is the Chair. The agreements they are speaking of have long been settled and the IRS is involved in the theft with Bush and others in the governmental structures. Especially Peter Bross, the former head of the IRS. The Wanta situation was made up By Papa Bush and the CIA to steal what they can from the drugs they sold. This is another way to steal their way out of trouble in the short term.CIA fairy tales. "

So what is Sakli´s intentions and why does it matter to us:

You can choose whether you want to believe the information about Sakli or not, but if it does, it offers an explanation for otherwise uforklare phenomenon, such as why the economic desperation is so great, and why people tynes for everything they own and have. We've got all of the information submitted to confirm Saklis identity, but to be able to verify it so we need to have direct access to the Federal Reserve monitors. What we now have are transcripts from the Federal Reserve showing that Sakli stands as owner of all Norwegian banks, among other things, as well as the Norwegian state debt. In the process of verifying the documents, we were able to ascertain that the banking system is also militarily organized, where one can collect information only on a need-to-know basis. To get in on the screens of the Federal Reserve, has proven to be as difficult as to blast their way into Fort Knox; Can any Norwegian bank do it? We are happy to take your suggestions. Saklis Federal Reserve ID's as noted today.

Sakli offers debt freedom if our Government can come out in the open dialogue about these things; all of the country's external debt aged receivables 1.1.2013 and the Western world is therefore de facto bankrupt, but stays afloat for as long as people – you & me-still have something to bring to the table that the State can collect. However, it is of course important to note that the money gets to the notarieforretning, and by entering into debt, and really only is air/paper/numbers on a screen. Borrowing is the premise of the show is called "the ironic growth."

Many of us have thought that Norway is in a special place, and allow themselves to salvage even if the rest of Europe in flames, but it's not so much more than an illusion that cracks the day Pension Fund goes down the drain, along with the rest of the European economy. Our task is to build up a realistic view of who we are, what our legal and actual status is in "welfare State", as well as try to understand how it could have that so much money is disappearing from the country, and to many of the organizations (in practice private operators if you follow the thread a piece backward) which in effect has taken over our country, EUROPEAN UNION, IMF, THE WHO; NATO etc. If this is OK for us, and we are happy that it is, then this is not something to think about. In the opposite case as the time has come to ask basic questions, quite simply.

And so you must by all means keep in mind to take it all in this article with a large pinch of salt, and keep in mind that it is written by one of those – PSTs definition poses a threat to the national security (at least in 2011, I don't know what it was like last year).

For the record, I would therefore take this opportunity to state that I support all peace initiatives, and the return of sovereignty and dignity to all the world's people, by peaceful means, and I am opposed to all violence and all acts of war. That's why I've been withdrawing my citizenship, among other things. So according to all conventional logic so it's well as the Norwegian State should fix its attention against, if peace on Earth had been a primary concern.

1. The legacy & Demise of Adnan Sakli:

2. Mr. Adnan Sakli´s last words (2014)



Sitter fremdeles med åpen munn etter å ha lest om disse avsløringene som i hvert fall for meg var helt ukjennt.

Her er det my å lese og tenke på før man gjør seg opp sin egen mening.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Enter your comments here: