A new perspective on Economics: Sakli vs One People's Public Trust
Nothing is as it seems to be everywhere you turn your gaze. What we today call "economy" is in reality a bad powered casinos. Welcome to the rabbit hole where truth outstrips imagination.
This
is a story that is beyond anything it is possible to imagine, and
which, if true, has the power to liberate us from corruption, poverty,
humiliation and confinement. It is based on the story of
Adnan Sakli and are intended to form a backdrop to evaluate the many
other initiatives that we've seen in the past, in particular, I think of
One People's Public Trust:
http://americankabuki.blogspot.no/2013/01/when-oppt-shoe-dropped-evidence-that.html
Even
in our country, which many think of as one of the best in the world, we
live with the financial parameters that most people know the
consequence of: 85% true tax pressure and minimum return in the form of
public goods. In the following, I take aim at showing how
it went for us in reality using our lives to working for the State,
which is the private banking Department agents.
This
article will largely be about how financial institutions, transactions
and ownership are completely different organized than at least i thought
so far, and how the circumstances surrounding the "Trust" and
"Positions of Prime" can record on a radical view.
Until
a short while ago, I thought that I had a certain overview of most
financial institutions/ ownership relationships, I thought the Federal
Reserve largely order was rewarding and I thought that much was all
about fractional reserve banking, fiatpengesystemet and private
ownership. It also, however, new insights have turned major
cracks in this paradigm, and has shown that the degree of secrecy and
deception is much more comprehensive, generalized and systematized than I
ever have on my part No. I just spoke with a girl who had taken a master's degree in "Trust Law", and she said the same thing. She
said, "no one would have believed me if I said that all significant
transactions taking place in Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Cayman Islands
and Switzerland, and has money laundering transactions as the primary
purpose".
So, what happened that changed everything?
In 1987 the World Bank went bankrupt, and all of the global central banking systems experienced a crack. One
person in the world had real capital enough to take ownership by the
Bank of International Settlements, under what's called Statutory Act. BIS is the Bank that lends to the central banks.
Under
what is called The reserve solvency regulations "were all government
bonds, commercial loans, ownership of all central banks into the same
account in the BIS. The man who was the owner of BIS, and also by all other accounts, named Adnan Sakli and he explains it this way:
«
So by their arrogance and with the position of the reserve laws, I
became the owner of everything by the fact that I was a free person with
no obligations and maximum liquidity. Then it just snow
balled over and over, and the law and my lack of criminality and their
greed made me even stronger to a point where they could not do anything
against me.»
He also says, in other words, when the Rothschild m / multi withdrew liquidity / money supply out of the market and the business collapsed, this transmitted up through the food chain, so that banks also went bowled-over. In these banks sent stress signals that they had not strength to cope with this, they drove for creditor bill and they will then creditor property. Bankruptcy fire engulfed central banks and major financial companies on Wall Street and London City, right up to the BIS (Bank of International Settlement). In this inferno, it was only a bank that had solidity enough to take over the BIS and it was Sakli its bank.
This means that Adnan Sakli own Norwegian government debt, -Norwegian MTNs and sovereign bonds- and can cancel it if certain requirements can be met. He also owns Rothschilds accounts, Vatican accounts etc. He also says that «That is how I became the Underwriter of the world,
Master trader, The sovereign, the Prime, etc,- plus the Vatican does not
have anything legal because I am the Prime and the Vatican has to get
its authority from the prime and to date it has not.»
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO4J6Fb-ivQ Adnan Sakli & The Global Debt Holder, Seegolam Naipaul
If this is true then there is also the implication that the Norwegian Government and Norwegian banks drifter illegitimately.
Clean-up in your mind the first step:
The
first step towards understanding these implications would need to be a
willingness to ask basic questions, and to be established thought
patterns after the seams. It is important to understand
that the media's mission is the dissemination of information, but rather
to support and maintain the common notion of how things hang together. You
can not assume that the content of this article coincides with what you
can read about in normal media, but you can even search all references
and claims online. You have the responsibility to evaluate the information.
I
would like to mention just one example of how the media's main job is
to keep the illusion and old programming in place: one of Norway's
foremost research and economic priorities right now, carbon capture and
storage:
http://www.forskning.no/artikler/2010/mai/249501
If
you go to delve into this topic then you will hopefully be able to
quickly see that the idea of man-made warming is mytemakeri and not
reality; This is a matter of "global governance" way beyond "global climate".
If
you read about "anthropogenic global warming" fraud "or" climategate ",
then you will quickly see that all elementary pieces of understanding
be omitted by the media. None the less continues the discourse in the media and among politicians as if nothing; We
"hang" in an outdated paradigm and pretend as if the lie is the truth
as long as it goes, and as long as it can still be appropriated billions
of billions of junk, air, nothing. It will of course mean
that the emperor as Stoltenberg 's, has long been very naked, and that
it would save the State budget for the huge expenses if we could see it.
In the following I will try to sum up how the economic landscape now looks like from my point of view. However, I'm open to all suggestions and always ready to correct what is wrong.
Some basic legal questions we need to ask ourselves:
Laws
and the legal system works within a society, constitute a sort of
"wrap" that keeps the community together, within certain limits, and not
so many question how legislation gets its authority from
.
For
example, many of us have taken for granted that the Constitution
amounts to the first position, and that it is not possible to invoke any
higher law than the Constitution. What should we,-basic
questions about legitimacy and jurisdiction provides the key to
understanding how the world works and how you can be free, if it is that
you want.
Some
questions we can ask ourselves is what is the first position, there is
no type-jurisdiction or trade-off that override other underlying
legislation? Is it true that the world is ruled as a "Trust" – who are so, "Trustee" and who is it that "the Entruster"?
If it should turn out to vote that all governments really are corporations, which I think, who are then we in this picture? Does it have any other owners korporasjonen Norway than what we are accustomed to believe? If
so, purely hypothetically, would prove that the Vatican owns
korporasjonen Norway, wouldn't it have been great if it turns out that
someone else with better intentions owns the Vatican, who claims that he
makes Sakli?
Vatican
claims itself to be "entrusted" by God, not just spiritual and
symbolic, but real and political, and the Vatican's financial dealings
as well as many pavebuller reflects this ambition:
http://www.cephas-library.com/nwo/nwo_how_the_world_really_works.html
These are topics that everyone should dig in on their own. The rule of thumb is that most of the basic important information is hidden, and deliberately made inaccessible. Two simple examples of many: what is the company? Who owns the IMF?
So some financial issues:
What exactly happens with the global economy? Where is all that money? If
we have used them up so someone must have earned them. what causes that
not government debt can be matched against other countries ' debts and
thus are offset? Why
is there a large scale robbery of resources such as water, electricity
and other commodities, and why people for their past tynes kroner in the
form of bailouts of banks, inflaterte market that allows the House and
home also be attributed to the banks, tax increases at levels that no
one should have to put up with while overførslene to warfare and
"humanitarian purpose" is not subject to critical review. What is the real relationship between law and Economics? Is there anything BI and NHH forgot to tell?
The starting point for understanding the economy today:
After
the stock market crash of 1929 eventually went the Western States
bankrupt and was forced to start with borrowing from international
sentralbankiere in order to finance the tasks the State had taken on. The population was posed as security for loans, and our future tax-bearing ability became the basis for valuation. If you are Googling "yield" or "Norwegian sovereign bonds"
(
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/norway/government-bond-yield)
then you will be able to quickly determine that it is the people's
freshwater towers, which are the product, so when Norway buying up Greek
or Spanish Government bonds these days, so they simply buy slaves on
the cheap sale for our money
.
The
establishment of institutions such as social security numbers and
Statistics Norway was necessary tools and it was also necessary to
organize all Nations that corporations, so that it now no longer are
Western Nations, only corporations. All international
transactions are governed by the Uniform Commercial Code or a
comparable, harmonised legal framework, and that is also why we are
confident that the State has created a straw man's identity for us, even
if all State agencies will deny that. the UCC is the only legislation
that asks that names be uppercase, as on driver license:
http://home.earthlink.net/~walterk1/Patr/UCC/AllCapName.html
Here is an example of obskurantismen around this theme; often an indicator that something is at stake:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/ucc_in_england_and_or_the_eu
Here's a video that explains this in simple rundown:
youtube.com/watch? v = jm9my4ujKrc
Here, as always, it is important that you do your own research.
If you are Googling AS Norway, up reasonable answer, then this is information being kept hidden. If you call a Ministry in hopes of getting answers, I think this is a bit futile, to say the least. The
answer I got from the Law Department of the Ministry of Justice was
that "a State is a State, it may not be registered as a corporate body"
(I have to then understand). My experience is that it's of
no use to call a political scientist at Blindern,-but here is a database
that lists some of the Nations that are registered as corporations:
http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&SIC=8888&owner=exclude&count=40
It is clear that in legal terms this grip provides "Nations" from
scratch, as the nation/korporasjonen only relate to you by SSN, i.e. the legal straw man that has been created for you, and not to you as a living man; natural person. In Norway, there may be reason to look more closely at your tasks & mandate of a company such as:
http://www.eksportfinans.no/investor-relations/investor-presentations/?ln=uk
The
premise for the system to work as it does is solely that you agree to
lend your straw man's identity to the korporasjonen (the nation) where
pro forma is considered "employed". This straw man's system
that makes it possible to issue Government bonds is the reason we have
gone away from the credit economy that must have the backing of real
assets.
When
the World Bank, and thus the world community again went bankrupt in
1987, pass a value of transfers which so far has caused pain, but
who has the ability to liberate us from the financial yoke and the
threat of bankruptcy threatening the world. Sakli
was seated as the formal owner of all of what we call "The global
collateral", and has so far withstood oligarkiets attempt to collect all
values in a few hands through to prevent redemption of bonds. Sakli
says that it is the lack of access to funds for the oligarchy is the
cause of desperation in the system that has allowed people to be squeezed to
the last drop. Sakli tells that he at one point became so tired
of the boundless corruption and lack of consideration in the top circles of
the system that he began to block transactions. The
first time I heard about Sakli because I read an article about a
businessman who had been kidnapped and taken to the notary will in
Rimini to obsessive-compulsive sign a payout of hundreds of billions:
http://www.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/Security/?id=3.1.453857197
Who gets to borrow the interest that is paid from taxes each year?
Until
1972 the Central operated the lending institutions continued with some
backing in gold, but after petrodollaren came into the picture, the
whole system is built up around "air", FIAT-money system, where values
are not secured in any real beyond my & your safety.
Sakli tells including this: "Fiat money was created in WW1 to steal the Ottoman's assets. The
German gold backed bonds were the first fiat money and the Germans
never had any gold to support the bonds they issued to fight WW1 against
the Ottomans.
"And
the Safra family's were the ones who were in charge of the Ottoman
Central bank that was in Lebanon, That was the reason why Israel invaded
Lebanon in 1974 to steal the gold that was there."
We are the real resources.
An
important premise is to understand that the whole economic system is
based on the fact that you have taken out loans, guarantees, and that
the State has taken out loans which you also guarantee via your
skatteytende ability. It is the reason why one of the strictest punishment is in our society is tax evasion or false information on the tax return. We
see that these are inflammable and highly topical theme, here we see
the Government's latest initiative to push us in a biometric database,
with appropriate legal implications:
http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/Foreslar-a-knytte-bilde-og-fingeravtrykk-til-folkeregisteret-7108848.html
Government
bonds make up the mainstay of the international economy, and it is
interesting to ask oneself who profit from it and why. Interest
rates on Government borrowing poses enormous annual sums that are paid
from taxes, for Germany-interest on government debt amounted to 69
billion euros in 2008. Here are some figures from the U.s. Treasury:
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/ir/ir_expense.htm
We
know that virtually all the lending banks are privately owned, and what
we really are witnessing, therefore, are the biggest safety transfers
from taxpayers to an oligarchy that is already sitting on most of the
Earth's resources. States ' debt often pointed to as the
reason for the economic collapse that has already taken place and most
likely will continue:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/debt-crises-and-market-turmoil-is-the-world-going-
bankrupt-a-779008. html
Often
directed against excessive consumption, targets private households and the irresponsible, but most often the exact opposite is the case. In Spain and Ireland had the debt been to return entirely to the Governments "may" baile out banks. In Ireland government debt increased from 11-23% between 2007-2012 and in Spain from 40-80% of GDP.
It is almost impossible to understand why countries with so much equity such as Norway fails to pay back its government debt. Here's what Norges Bank says about this:
http://www.norges-bank.com/en/price stability/government debt/why-did-it-Norwegian-State debt/
Norway paid 22, 6 billion in interest payments on government debt in 2011. Most
likely to say this someone about how Governments have let themselves
bind and commit to private bankiers, in the form of either to go along
with legislation that makes it impossible for a State to "borrow" by
itself, or in the form of direct pressure and threats. It
therefore seems obvious that interest rates on government loans
constitute a source of income that someone does not want to miss (above
oligarchy) and the grave truth is that the State agrees that the relevant
question is "why"?
If
it turns out that the first position is Sakli, so does that mean that
Norges Bank, the Norwegian Government, all the world's banks and
institutions are acting illegally, but it also means that it is easier
to see the reason behind the seemingly desperate economic policy.
Sakli
relates that desperation in the system and the lack of access to funds,
has allowed Governments and corporations have had to retrieve their
funds from innovations; bailouts, "bubbles" (housing bubble etc), increased taxes, increased alcohol to "humanitarian interventions" etc.
That's
partly why Sakli has filed a lawsuit against many countries '
Governments to cooperate in Liborskandalen (Governments/banker conspire
against ordinary people through interest rate manipulation in order to
"crack" a market, and then either buy the cheap sale afterwards, or
confiscate):
http://dockets.justia.com/docket/florida/flmdce/6:2012cv00567/270275/
Sakli
explains that the main problem is that it has been established a during
operation where Governments and banking institutions together conspire
to override his authority as "Prime", and herein lies also the
possibilities for us if this is true.
So can it be true? says Sakli, are there indications or evidence that supports what he says?
The
premise for that to be hold in Saklis history, is that there must be a
starting point for the law, all contractors derive their authority from,
a so-called "First position of the Law", within the framework of "man
made" laws. Sakli says his role is to represent "the first position of the law", and as such so is he "global underwriter". This
was not the terms I knew before I got to know Sakli but a lot seem to
suggest that the United Nations has actually appointed their own
"underwriter", Ray C. Dam through a body called The Office of
International Control, OITC Treasure, which claims to be the "Chartered
under the UN charter control". It is important to be aware that Sakli operates within a universe of man made law, which essentially emanates from the Vatican. Interestingly
enough, a constitutional amendment was made in section 2 the 21 May
2012, which our law universe was changed from being a
Lutheran-Evangelical Christian-humanist to
Catholic
.
That
means that if it is true that the UNITED NATIONS recognizes the need
for a global signature, then it is about credibility Saklis set against
the United Nations.
Wikipedia claims that the OITC is a seemingly elaborate fraudulent organization which claims to be associated with the United Nations and the The Federal Reserve , the central bank of the United States . ", but it turns out that the United Nations most likely to have been host for OITC on its Web site, even if it is deleted now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v = JO93tyy1Bz0
This
is more than interesting in light of the fact that that the entire
tells Sakli underlying the structure of the Federal Reserve, The
Committee of 300, the Vatican, King families etc, which we know are
operating under the same agenda, has long sought to take control of what
is called "the global collateral" in order to circumvent the Saklis
signature. Many are asking today, their trust in The One
Peoples ' Public Trust, which claims to have closed-"foreclosed"-all financial institutions; all of the old structure within the framework of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Even I don't know, but I follow the development with excitement
.
The
fact that the United Nations will most likely have created their own
global signaturholder should be seen in the light of this, and is
understood as a strategy to be able to get in a position to manage the
global collateral. "If you are not familiar with the background of United Nations creation, I recommend you to get a little background info on this:
http://collectivepsyche.iwarp.com/whats_new_22.html
We
also know that many of the leaders of the United Nations, Ban Ki-Moon,
Kofi Annan etc have been involved in heavy corruption cases. In
the past, the one replaced the other, unveiling actors like
Benjamin Fulford, David Wilcock, The White Dragon Society, Neil Keenan
etc, and they have assumed the document like this:
http://benjaminfulford.typepad.com/benjaminfulford/2012/01/my-recent-find.html
The common denominator is that they support any United Nations agenda and Ray C Dams candidacy as global "underwriter". So then we have Sakli on one side and Ray c. Dam, UN, Keenan, Fulford etc on the other. One People's Public Trust is supported by the same actors.
Adnan
Sakli emerges as the "good guy," "white hat" and have made numerous
attempts at dialogue with many countries ' Governments to cancel
government debt against that power be returned to the people, and
agreements with institutions such as the IMF are broken, UN etc, which
most people think of as the representatives of the world community and
world peace, but which really stands for a cynicism that far exceeds what
most can imagine. For
more information on what our agreements with organizations such as the
IMF, the WHO etc actually means for the transfer of sovereignty and the
money, see this page:
http://rense.com/general92/thit.htm
arguing that e.g. the IMF is owned by the u.s. Treasury, which in turn is owned by the Vatican.
It's
more than interesting to ask oneself whether there is any link between
the Vatican and Norwegian power structures, and whether our Government
is required to "buy" up to 40% of the IMF, or if the acquisition isn't
really something a yet another transfer to an elite that nourish
themselves of our ignorance and indifference.
If it turns out that the Vatican owns Sakli, it clearly looks different. There's a lot of information out there on the Web that opposes the
rense.com as I refer to here, so the premise is all the time that you have to trust yourself and do your own research. You can definitely not rely on newspapers, it should be fairly clear in due course.
Sakli tells himself that the world is ruled this way:
«The governments are under the control of the Royal structures like the Rome commission. The Royals control the mafia as their street operational people. Most
of the organized crime is via the EU commission, House of lords, League
of nations, and via the Unilateral agreement of the Global joint
agreement with the triad, yakuza, various groups of mafia flags, The
Black mafia, the Jewish mafia, the Italian mafia , the Albanian mafia,
the Russian mafia, -all one way or another connected to the Royal
families and their intelligence networks. The masons are a leadership of both the governmental and the street level operation. It all links to the drug trade and the arms deals.»
If this sounds unlikely, I would recommend Herman Berges articles on www.rettsnorge.no about the backdrop of the financial institutions belonging in Luxembourg, the Cayman Islands, Switzerland etc and who has money laundering from weapons and drug sales that sole purpose. Herman Berge sits on a unique and pioneering expertise, and has time and again been attempted gagged brutally. What we therefore are witnessing today is the systematic crime implemented by international financial institutions, politicians and royal families. Which actors who actually participate in this is a bit unclear, but attendance at Bilderberg Meetings is not a good indicator.
This has now say about Sakli Leo Wanta Fund
http://rense.com/general70/leo.htm:
The 1.5 trillion is a short term fix that will be eaten up as soon as it is the Chair. The
agreements they are speaking of have long been settled and the IRS is
involved in the theft with Bush and others in the governmental
structures. Especially Peter Bross, the former head of the IRS. The Wanta situation was made up By Papa Bush and the CIA to steal what they can from the drugs they sold. This is another way to steal their way out of trouble in the short term.CIA fairy tales. "
So what is Sakli´s intentions and why does it matter to us:
You
can choose whether you want to believe the information about Sakli or
not, but if it does, it offers an explanation for otherwise uforklare
phenomenon, such as why the economic desperation is so great, and why
people tynes for everything they own and have. We've
got all of the information submitted to confirm Saklis identity, but to
be able to verify it so we need to have direct access to the Federal
Reserve monitors. What we now have are transcripts from the
Federal Reserve showing that Sakli stands as owner of all Norwegian
banks, among other things, as well as the Norwegian state debt. In
the process of verifying the documents, we were able to ascertain that
the banking system is also militarily organized, where one can collect
information only on a need-to-know basis. To get in on the screens of the Federal Reserve, has proven to be as difficult as to blast their way into Fort Knox; Can any Norwegian bank do it? We are happy to take your suggestions. Saklis Federal Reserve ID's as noted today.
Sakli offers debt freedom if our Government can come out in the open dialogue about these things; all
of the country's external debt aged receivables 1.1.2013 and the
Western world is therefore de facto bankrupt, but stays afloat for as
long as people – you & me-still have something to bring to the table
that the State can collect. However, it is of course
important to note that the money gets to the notarieforretning, and by
entering into debt, and really only is air/paper/numbers on a screen. Borrowing is the premise of the show is called "the ironic growth."
Many
of us have thought that Norway is in a special place, and allow
themselves to salvage even if the rest of Europe in flames, but it's not
so much more than an illusion that cracks the day Pension Fund goes
down the drain, along with the rest of the European economy. Our
task is to build up a realistic view of who we are, what our legal and
actual status is in "welfare State", as well as try to understand how it
could have that so much money is disappearing from the country, and to
many of the organizations (in practice private operators if you follow
the thread a piece backward) which in effect has taken over our country, EUROPEAN UNION, IMF, THE WHO; NATO etc. If this is OK for us, and we are happy that it is, then this is not something to think about. In the opposite case as the time has come to ask basic questions, quite simply.
And
so you must by all means keep in mind to take it all in this article
with a large pinch of salt, and keep in mind that it is written by one
of those – PSTs definition poses a threat to the national security (at
least in 2011, I don't know what it was like last year).
For
the record, I would therefore take this opportunity to state that I
support all peace initiatives, and the return of sovereignty and dignity to
all the world's people, by peaceful means, and I am opposed to all
violence and all acts of war. That's why I've been withdrawing my citizenship, among other things. So
according to all conventional logic so it's well as the Norwegian State
should fix its attention against, if peace on Earth had been a primary
concern.
The newly-appointed Norwegian NATO secretary general Jens Stoltenberg has been working for the KGB, the main Russian spy agency, under the code-name "Steklov", according to former KGB officers Mikhail Butkov and Oleg Gordievsky.
